DHCS has updated the Statewide Average Private Pay Rate (APPR) figure to $8515. This figure is used to determine any relevant periods of ineligibility due to disqualifying property transfers in 2017.
DHCS ACWDL 17-14 (May 11, 2017).
Summaries of select CalWORKs, CalFresh, Health and Housing Regulations
Yearly Archives: 2017
Guidance on Continuity of Care for MER Denials
DHCS issued a new letter to non-COHS health plans reminding MCPs to treat denied medical exemption requests (MERs) as an automatic request for continuity of care with an existing FFS or nonparticipating health plan provider. MCPs must make every effort to ensure that the beneficiary is allowed to continue to receive ongoing medical care through his or her FFS or nonparticipating health plan provider(s).
MCPs must process these requests within 5 working days from receipt of request. DHCS is also urging MCPs to allow non-contracted providers to continue a beneficiary’s treatment plan for other services that are not contracted. MCPs can provide more than the statutory 12-month continuity of care period if they so choose.
DHCS APL 17-007 (May 11, 2017)
Changes to Managed Care Appeal and Grievance Processes
DHCS has issued updates and clarifications for Managed Care Plans (MCPs) and Dental Managed Care Plans (DMCs) regarding new federal guidelines around the grievance and appeals process. These rules take effect July 1, 2017. Attachment A summarizes the key changes outlined in the All Plan Letter.
Definitions
The new guidelines clarify some definitions. “Actions” are now called “Adverse Benefit Determinations,” though the definition encompasses all previously existing elements of “Actions.” The guidelines separately define “Grievance” and “Appeal.”
Adverse Benefit Determinations
MCPs must make decisions on requests for services within five business days from receiving reasonably necessary information, but may not exceed 14 calendar days to make a decision. Otherwise, the lack of decision is considered an adverse benefit determination that triggers appeal rights. Expedited requests must be considered within 72 hours. If services are to be terminated, suspended, or reduced, MCPs must notify beneficiaries at least ten days before the action is to take place.
Written notices (NOAs) need to be dated and postmarked within two days of the decision. Starting July 1, DHCS requires MCPs to use a revised NOA template and “Your Rights” attachment. The revised NOA includes information about requesting information relevant to the NOA at no cost. The guidelines lay out what information must be listed in the NOA when the decision is based on medical necessity. Otherwise, NOAs must provide a clear and concise explanation for the decision. These NOAs must be translated into required threshold languages; if the clinical information cannot be translated, the beneficiary must be informed how they can get a verbal translation of the information.
Because of changes to the federal regulations about appeals, DHCS has updated NOA language regarding beneficiary rights to review of adverse decisions. Beneficiaries must request an internal appeal withing 60 calendar days of the date on the NOA. State hearings are an option only after filing an internal grievance. For these reasons, the “Your Rights” attachment for NOAs will primarily inform a beneficiary about internal appeals, while a Notice of Appeal Resolution (NAR) will provide information about filing for a state fair hearing or IMR.
Grievances
The new federal regulations allow beneficiaries, their providers, or authorized representatives to file grievances at any time (as opposed to the current 180 days) either orally or in writing. MCPs must acknowledge grievances in writing within five calendar days of receiving the grievance. MCPs have 30 calendar days to resolve the grievance. Expedited grievances must be considered within 72 hours, so MCPs must timestamp these requests.
Appeals and State Hearings
Under the new regulations, beneficiaries or their authorized representatives will have to file appeals orally or in writing with MCPs within 60 calendar days from the date of the NOA (as opposed to the current 90 days). Oral appeals must be followed with a signed, written copy of the appeal; MCPs must assist beneficiaries in preparing a written appeal. MCPs must acknowledge receipt of an appeal within five calendar days, and they must resolve the appeal within 30 days. Expedited appeals must be resolved within 72 hours of receipt.
When an appeal is not completely in favor of the beneficiary, MCPs must send a NAR with the rationale (clinical information for medical necessity denials, contract provisions for non-covered benefits). The NAR must include a “Your Rights” attachment outlining rights to request a state hearing within 120 calendar days, to receive aid paid pending, and to request an IMR (for Knox-Keene licensed plans). When an appeal is favorable, MCPs must send written notification and authorize the services no later than 72 hours from resolution.
Beneficiaries can request a state fair hearing within 120 days of exhausting an MCP’s internal appeal process and receiving a NAR. The State must reach its decision within 90 days of the date of the request, and within three working days for an expedited request. MCPs would have 72 hours to comply with a hearing decision.
DHCS APL 17-006 (May 9, 2017).
DHCS Dental APL 17-003 (May 24, 2017).
Reopening of Social Security decision based on Supreme Court decision finding law unconstitutional
Social Security has issued a ruling regarding reopening of Title II and Title XVI cases when the decision is based on a law that the United States Supreme Court finds to be unconstitutional. This issue has recently arisen because of the Supreme Court decisions in United States v. Windsor regarding constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act and Obergfell v. Hodges regarding the constitutionality of state laws banning same-sex marriage.
Social Security has decided that a determination based on a law that the United States Supreme Court has found to be unconstitutional is an error on the face of the evidence. This means that a decision can be reopened if 1) the determination or decision is based on a federal or state law that the United States Supreme Court holds is unconstitutional, 2) the application of that law was material to the determination or decision, and 3) it is within the following timeframes: A) For Title II claims, within four years of the notice of initial determination, B) For Title II claims, at any time if the determination or decision was fully or partially unfavorable, or C) For Title XVI claims, within two years of the notice of initial determination. SSR 17-1p (March 1, 2017).
CalFresh Elderly Simplified Application Project
The California Department of Social Services (CDSS) has issued instructions about the CalFresh Elderly Simplified Application Project (ESAP). CDSS received a waiver to implement ESAP beginning October 1, 2017.
ESAP will do three things for elderly (age 60 or older) and/or disabled households:
- Waive the recertification interview requirement for elderly and/or disabled households with no earned income. Cases will not be denied at recertification without an attempt to schedule an interview. The county can require an interview if the information supplied is incomplete, questionable or contradictory. Households will be able to request a recertification interview. An interview at initial certification will still be required.
- Use data matching to reduce client-provided verifications for elderly and/or disabled households with no earned income.
- Extend the certification period to 36 months for elderly and/or disabled households with no earned income.
ESAP households will use the SAR-7 form to report any changes at 12 months and 24 months. If an ESAP household becomes ineligible for ESAP but remains eligible for CalFresh (for example by becoming employed) the county will convert the case to a regular CalFresh household. (ACL 17-34, April 25, 2017.)
CAPI sponsor deeming
The California Department of Social Services (CDSS) has issued instructions about sponsor deeming in the Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI) program. If the CAPI applicant or recipient’s sponsor is disabled, the sponsor’s income is deemed to the CAPI applicant or recipient until the sponsor dies, the applicant or recipient naturalizes or the applicant or recipient has worked for 40 quarters in the United States. If the sponsor is not disabled, deeming is for 10 years from date of entry or date of execution of the affidavit of support, whichever is later.
When sponsor deeming applies, the sponsor must provide the county with their income and resources when the sponsored immigrant applies for CAPI and at least annually after CAPI is granted. The county will send a form to the sponsor and the CAPI applicant or recipient requesting information from the sponsor. The SOC 860 form is recommended but not required. The sponsor will be given 15 days to provide the information. If the sponsor does not respond, the county will send a second copy of the form to the sponsor. If the sponsor does not respond, the county will deny or discontinue CAPI. If the sponsor does not submit requested verification, the county will deny or discontinue CAPI.
If an immigrant is no longer being provided with support by their sponsor, and as a result the immigrant is no longer able to provide themselves with food and shelter, the immigrant may be eligible for the indigence exception to sponsor deeming. The applicant or recipient can apply for the indigence exception by completing the SOC 809 form. The county will compare the information provided by the applicant or recipient and the information from the sponsor in deciding whether to grant the indigence exception. Note that when the sponsor has no income, there is no need for the indigence exception because the sponsor has no income to deem.
If the whereabouts of the sponsor are unknown, the county investigates the sponsor’s location by submitting a Form G-845 to USCIS. If the county is satisfied based on the response to the G-845 and any other investigation the county does that the sponsor’s whereabouts are unknown, the county should accept the CAPI applicant or recipient’s statement regarding the sponsor’s lack of support unless those statements conflict with other information in the case file. (ACL 17-33, April 17, 2017.)