Author: Stephen Goldberg

CAPI sponsor deeming

Posted on by

The California Department of Social Services (CDSS) has issued instructions about sponsor deeming in the Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI) program.  If the CAPI applicant or recipient’s sponsor is disabled, the sponsor’s income is deemed to the CAPI applicant or recipient until the sponsor dies, the applicant or recipient naturalizes or the applicant or recipient has worked for 40 quarters in the United States.  If the sponsor is not disabled, deeming is for 10 years from date of entry or date of execution of the affidavit of support, whichever is later.

When sponsor deeming applies, the sponsor must provide the county with their income and resources when the sponsored immigrant applies for CAPI and at least annually after CAPI is granted.  The county will send a form to the sponsor and the CAPI applicant or recipient requesting information from the sponsor.  The SOC 860 form is recommended but not required.  The sponsor will be given 15 days to provide the information.  If the sponsor does not respond, the county will send a second copy of the form to the sponsor.  If the sponsor does not respond, the county will deny or discontinue CAPI.  If the sponsor does not submit requested verification, the county will deny or discontinue CAPI.

If an immigrant is no longer being provided with support by their sponsor, and as a result the immigrant is no longer able to provide themselves with food and shelter, the immigrant may be eligible for the indigence exception to sponsor deeming.  The applicant or recipient can apply for the indigence exception by completing the SOC 809 form.  The county will compare the information provided by the applicant or recipient and the information from the sponsor in deciding whether to grant the indigence exception.  Note that when the sponsor has no income, there is no need for the indigence exception because the sponsor has no income to deem.

If the whereabouts of the sponsor are unknown, the county investigates the sponsor’s location by submitting a Form G-845 to USCIS.  If the county is satisfied based on the response to the G-845 and any other investigation the county does that the sponsor’s whereabouts are unknown, the county should accept the CAPI applicant or recipient’s statement regarding the sponsor’s lack of support unless those statements conflict with other information in the case file.  (ACL 17-33, April 17, 2017.)

Transfer of families to Stage 2 child care

Posted on by

The California Department of Education (CDE) has issued instructions about the process for transferring families from Stage 1 to Stage 2 child care.  Both Stage 1 and Stage 2 child care are for families receiving CalWORKs.  Stage 1 child care is administered by a county welfare department (CWD) or a child care alternative payment program (APP) under contract with a CWD.  Families are transitioned to Stage 2 when the county determined they are “stable.”  Stage 2 is administered by APPs.

The process to transfer from Stage 1 to Stage 2 is to be seemless with no break in services.  Stage 2 programs must develop efficient and coordinated systems with Stage 1 programs to ensure that child care services seamlessly continue for families moving between Stage 1 and Stage 2 with no break in aid.

CalWORKs families are categorically eligible for Stage 2 and pay no family fees.  A family receiving CalWORKs does not need to report changes in income or family size to the APP and cannot be terminated for failure to do so.  If a family receiving CalWORKs would otherwise have their child care terminated for violation of an APP’s policies, the APP must notify the CWD to determine what steps to take including referral back to Stage 1.

When transferring from either Stage 1 or another Stage 2 program, the APP can only require nine listed data elements and cannot require any other information from the family.  The APP must request the nine data elements from Stage 1 or other Stage 2 program.  The family is not responsible for providing the information.  APPs cannot require the family or child care provider to furnish documentation provided to the Stage 1 or other Stage 2 program within one year of the application date unless documentation is missing and that documentation affects eligibility for services.

When the Stage 2 program receives the nine data elements, it must assume full responsibility for reimbursing the provider, provide the parent with a notice that the transfer is complete, and notify the family about returning the transfer of enrollment form to certify that the nine data elements are correct.  The APP should allow at least 30 days to return the transfer of enrollment form and should not terminate services for failure to return the transfer of enrollment for six months.

The APP cannot require the family to complete a new application and cannot require the family to furnish information previously provided to the transferring Stage 1 or other Stage 2 program unless there is a reported change that requires an update.  (Management Bulletin 17-06, May, 2017.)

CalFresh Standard Medical Expense Deduction project

Posted on by

The California Department of Social Services (CDSS) has issued instructions about implementation of CalFresh Standard Medical Expense deduction.  CDSS received a waiver to implement a Standard Medical Expense deduction beginning October 1, 2017.

Elderly and/or disabled households with medical expenses over $35 per month are entitled to a CalFresh income deduction for their medical expenses.  Currently, the deduction is dollar for dollar verified medical expenses over $35 per month.  Effective October 1, 2017, the medical expense deduction will be a standard $120 per month when the elderly and/or disabled household has over $35 per month of medical expenses.  If verified medical expenses are over $155 per month, the household will be able to deduct actual medical expenses.

Households can voluntarily report medical expense increases mid-period and the new deduction amount will be used for the remainder of the reporting period.  (ACL 17-35, April 25, 2017.)

CalFresh processing for domestic violence survivors

Posted on by

The California Department of Social Services (CDSS) has issued instructions about AB 2057 regarding CalFresh processing for domestic violence survivors.  A domestic violence survivor who is a resident of a shelter and whose current CalFresh household includes the abuser can apply for CalFresh as a separate household and may be eligible for an additional allotment of CalFresh once per month.  Shelter residents and their children can be aided as members of the former household and as members of a new household once per month.

If the domestic violence survivor is the head of household, the survivor may ask to close the former CalFresh case that included the abuser.  If the request is made is writing or in the presence of an eligibility worker, the change can be made with adequate notice.  If the request is made verbally, the county must provide both adequate and timely (10 days) notice.

CDSS must provide shelters with information about CalFresh eligibility for domestic violence survivors.  CDSS provided a sample with its instructions.

Domestic survivors are now deferred from mandatory participation in CalFresh Employment and Training.  Counties must accept self-attestation of domestic violence unless there is strong evidence that the self-attestation is not credible.  (ACL 17-30, April 17, 2017.)

Evidence to determine medical equivalence in Social Security cases

Posted on by

Social Security has issued a ruling regarding evidence needed for a finding of medical equivalence to a listing.  This ruling rescinds and replaces Social Security Ruling 96-6p.

An impairment is considered medically equivalent to a listed impairment if it is at least equal in severity and duration to the criteria of a listed impairment.  Social Security can find medical equivalence in three ways:  1) the individual does not exhibit one or more of the findings required by a listing or one or more of the findings is not as severe as required by a listing, but there are other findings related to the impairment that are at least of equal medical significance to the required criteria; 2) the individual has an impairment not described in a listing but has findings related to the impairment that are at least of equal medical equivalence to an analogous listing or 3) the individual has a combination of impairments no one of which meets a listing but has findings related to the impairment that are at least of equal medical equivalence to an analogous listing

To demonstrate an individual is disabled based on medical equivalence, the record must contain either 1) a prior administrative finding from a medical consultant or psychological consultant; 2) medical expert evidence at the hearing level or 3) a report from the Appeals Counsel medical support staff.  It seems that evidence from the claimant’s provider cannot support a finding of medical equivalence.

An administrative law judge (ALJ) is not required to obtain medical expert evidence if the ALJ believes that the evidence does not reasonably support a finding of medical equivalence.  ALJs are not required to articulate specific evidence to support a finding that an impairment does not equal a listing.  A statement that the impairment does not equal a listing is sufficient.  SSR 17-2p (March 27, 2017).

 

 

 

Posted in SSI

IHSS overtime exemption for extraordinary circumstances

Posted on by

CDSS has issued instructions about the IHSS overtime exemption for extraordinary circumstances.  The criteria and initial instructions for the IHSS overtime exemption for extraordinary circumstances are in ACL 16-22, summarized here.

CDSS’ new instructions address renewal of an extraordinary circumstances exemption.  All conditions on which the exemption was initially granted must remain the same for an exemption to be renewed.  If there has been any changes, the county must submit to CDSS a referral for a new exemption instead of renewal of the existing exemption.

Prior to submitting the renewal request, the recipients must explore and exhaust all options for hiring additional providers in the same manner as for the initial exemption request.  This includes contacting relatives, friends, neighbors or other people the recipient knows about their willingness to be a provider, contacting provider registries both in the county where the recipient lives and in neighboring counties, and utilizing alternative resources such a Regional Center services, to address issues with the recipient’s ability to tolerate an outside provider.

CDSS eliminated the requirement to perform a renewal at the next face-to-face reassessment when reassessment occurs before the end of the six month or one year period of the exemption.  However, requests for renewals must be submitted to CDSS by the county no less than 30 days before the exemption ends.

CDSS also clarified that counties determine when to submit exemption requests to CDSS and the county shall not submit either an initial referral or request to renew to CDSS if the county decides other resources are available.  (ACL 17-13, April 7, 2017.)