CalWORKs

Use of the Work Number

Posted on by

NOTE — The section of this ACL regarding the Work Number being used in conjunction with, but not in lieu of, existing income and eligibility sources, is superseded by ACL 21-16.

The California Department of Social Services (CDSS) has issued guidance regarding use of the Work Number consumer credit report in determining initial and ongoing eligibility for various programs. 

For CalFresh, if documentary evidence of income is unavailable, for example because a household member did not provide or does not have access to necessary documentation at the time of the application or interview, the Work Number can be used to verify income in real time at application, during the certification period, at recertification, or for a Quality Control review.

Information obtained through the Work Number is not considered verified upon receipt which means the applicant or recipient must be consulted before the county can use the information.  If the information provided by the Work Number is consistent with information provided by the applicant or recipient, consultation is not necessary.  If the household confirms the information from the Work Number is accurate or there is no discrepancy, the Work Number can be used to verify income.

The Work number can be used in conjunction with, but not instead of existing required income and eligibility sources including IEVS.

Counties cannot require the household to submit additional documentation that is duplicative of information received through the Work Number.  Counties can request additional documentation only if the household states that the information is inaccurate or the Work Number does not verify all income sources.

If the county takes adverse action based on information from the Work Number, the notice of action must state the name, address and telephone number of the Work Number, a statement that the Work Number did not make the adverse decision, a statement of the right to obtain free disclosure of the consumer’s file within 60 days, and a statement of the consumer’s right to dispute the accuracy or completeness of any information provided by the Work Number.

Counties can use the Work Number to verify information received at initial application or recertification.  This can allow same day service when documentary evidence is not available on the day the application is submitted.

Counties can use the Work Number to verify a voluntary report of a change in income or to verify income information provided at periodic report.

For Quality Control reviews, counties can use the Work Number to substantiate information provided by the household or if the household refuses to cooperate.

For CalWORKs, counties can use the Work Number to verify information at application, redetermination and to determine ongoing eligibility.  The Work Number can be used to verify welfare-to-work information for Work Participation Rate purposes.  Counties can use the Work Number to verify income when transitioning clients from State One to Stage Two child care.

The Work Number cannot be used to verify a missing mandatory report of income over the Income Reporting Threshold.

For IEVS matches, if the client does not respond to the verification letter, the county can use the Work Number as the independent verification source.

The Special Investigations Unit can use the Work Number to verify information from IEVS. (ACL 19-08, February 9, 2019.)

Disability and domestic violence questions computer system flags

Posted on by

The California Department of Social Services (CDSS) has issued directions regarding AB 2030.  AB 2030 requires CDSS to include in any amendments or revisions to standard application or semi-annual reporting forms after January 1, 2019 that allow applicants or recipients to disclose disabilities, the need for reasonable accommodations because of a disability and any experiences of domestic violence. 

CDSS states that initial application forms and semiannual report will capture the need for reasonable accommodations the next time they are revised.

The current welfare computer system vary in how they flag reasonable accommodations.  CalWIN has an icon for disability accommodations that is displayed in the upper-right side of the “Display Individual Demographics Summary” window.  CalACES North (formerly known as C-IV) can flag cases with an indicator type that county users can select (special accommodations, special circumstances etc.)  CalACES South (formerly known as LRS) allows any county user with access to falg a case to alert the first point of contact.  These flags are identified by a banner at the top of every page.  (ACL 19-13, February 21, 2019.)

CalWORKs overpayment collection threshold and discharge

Posted on by

THIS ACL HAS BEEN SUPERCEEDED BY ACL 19-102, summarized here.

The California Department of Social Services has issued instruction regarding SB 726.  Effective July 1, 2019, SB 726 will increase the threshold for pursing CalWORKs overpayments and implement an expungement process for CalWORKs overpayments.

Previously, counties could not demand repayment of non-fraudulent CalWORKs overpayments that were less than $35.  Effective July 1, 2019, this overpayment threshold increases to $250.  The overpayment threshold applies only to closed cases.  When the case is active, counties must pursue collection regardless of the amount of the overpayment.  If the case involves a fraud allegation, the overpayment threshold does not apply.

If an overpayment is being repaid in installments, counties must cease collection when the outstanding balance falls under $250.  When there are multiple overpayments, the $250 threshold applies to each overpayment individually.

Effective July 1, 2019, counties must cease collection on non-fraudlent CalWORKs overpayments if the responsible individual has not received CalWORKs for 36 consecutive months or longer.  If a former recipient with an outstanding overpayment claim reapplies and becomes CalWORKs recipient within the 36 month time frame, the county will resume collection of the overpayment.  Overpayment discharge also applies to repayment agreements and civil judgment agreements.  When there are multiple overpayments, the 36 month time frame applies to each overpayment individually.  The 36 month time frame applies retroactively to non-fraudulent overpayments outstanding on July 1, 2019.


The 36 month discharge time frame does not when there is a pending fraud investigation unless the investigation is inconclusive or finds no fraud was committed.  The discharge time frame does not apply to overpayments established before December 1, 1996 because federal law requires collection of those overpayments.

In addition, mass overpayments, which are defined as an action or inaction that impacts either eight percent of the county CalWORKs caseload or more than 1,000 CalWORKs assistance units, whichever is greater, must be reported to CDSS.  After reporting, CDSS will determine if the mass overpayment was caused by negligence or fraud by the county, or a major system error by the state or the county.  CDSS will then determine if those overpayments can be discharged.  (ACL 19-19, February 21, 2019.)

Third Party Assessment Process

Posted on by

The California Department of Social Services has issued a clarification regarding its policy regarding referral for third party assessment when the county and the participant cannot agree on a welfare-to-work (WTW) assessment or a WTW plan.

If the participant does not agree with the results of their WTW assessment and does not reach an agreement with the county about their WTW plan, the county must refer the participant to an impartial third party for an independent assessment.  The county must refer for a third party assessment if the county and the participant do not agree on WTW assessment or the unsigned plan or a signed WTW plan in limited circumstances.

Prior to the appraisal, counties must provide an orientation that informs participants of their right to a third party assessment.  Participants must sign Rights and Responsibilities (WTW 1) and the Plan Activities form (WTW 2), each of which inform the participant of their right to a third party assessment.

After the plan is signed, the client has a once-in-a-lifetime 30 day grace period from the beginning of the WTW activity to request a change in the plan or reassignment to another activity.  The county must grant the request if another assignment is available, is consistent with the WTW plan, and the county determines the other activity will lead to employment.  The participant can request a third party assessment during the 30 day grace period.

The county must allow the participant three working days after signing the plan or amendments to the plan to request changes.  During the three working days after signing the plan, the participant can request a third party assessment.  If the participant expresses dissatisfaction with the plan in the first three working days, it will not trigger the use of the client’s once-in-a-lifetime 30 day grace period.  If the participant expresses dissatisfaction with the plan after three working days and has not used their once-in-a-lifetime 30 day grace period, the county can apply the 30 day grace period and grant a third party assessment.

The participant must adhere to the signed WTW plan if it is after the three working day or 30 day grace periods.  The county can revised a WTW plan at any time if it is in the best interest of the participant to do so.

The results of a third party assessment are binding and used by the client and the county to create an appropriate plan.  The participant is not entitled to a state hearing to challenge the assessment until a third party assessment has been performed. (ACIN I-03-19, January 17, 2019.)

Welfare-to-work sanction checklist

Posted on by

CDSS has issued a checklist to determine non-compliance with welfare-to-work requirements. The checklist is designed to ensure appropriate steps are taken to resolve any instance on non-compliance.

Counties may revise the checklist to remain consistent with county-level guidance. However, any modifications should be inclusive of the steps and content provided in the checklist.

Use of the checklist is voluntary.  (ACIN I-84-18, January 14, 2019.)

EBT skimming and scams

Posted on by

The California Department of Social Services has issued instructions regarding replacement of electronic benefits transfers (EBT) stolen by skimming or scams.  Skimming is using electronic equipment to capture the recipients’ EBT card and create a counterfeit card.  Scams involve deceiving or misleading a recipient to provide their account information and then using that information to create a counterfeit card.

Claims for electronic theft are made using the EBT 2259 form.  Recipients can contact either the EBT Customer Service Helpline or the county welfare department. 

In addition to the EBT 2259 form, recipients are required to file a police report unless there is good cause.  The police report number is required on the EBT 2259 form but a copy of the report is not required.  Good cause for not filing a police report includes that the police department does not accept reports of identity theft or financial fraud, the police department does not provide interpreter services for non-English speakers, there is a fee to file the police report, the police department does not provide disability accommodations, the recipient does not have transportation, and submitting a report in person would interfere with participation in welfare-to-work activities.

Counties review the EBT 2259 form and determine if it is complete and whether the allegations are consistent with typical scamming practices.  If the claim does not allege typical scamming practices it is considered for further review.  In addition, counties must verify that benefits for the recipient have not been restored because of scamming in the last 36 months. 

Recipients must file an electronic theft claim within 90 days.

Counties have 10 days to issue repayment unless there is a fraud investigation or over $2,000 is involved.  The reimbursement is not counted as income or property in the month received or the next month.  (ACL 18-148, December 31, 2018.)

Update: People reporting electronic theft no longer need to contact the electronic benefits transfer vendor prior to submitting the form EBT 2259 to the county.  People reporting electronic theft must contact the county within 10 days of the loss, and file the EBT 2259 form with the county within 90 days of the loss. People no longer are required to file a police report to submit the form EBT 2259 and get replacement benefits.  (ACL 23-13, January 27, 2023.)