ACL 07-49: New Federal Policy Guidelines Relating To The Foster Care Program (12/19/07)

HSS came out with new guidelines for temporary absences and linkage to the TANF program, are are implemented in California by this ACL. Full grants will be paid for brief absences of less than 14 days, after which the grant will be prorated. For linkage, eligibility criteria, including deprivation, must be met in the month of, but
prior to, the child’s removal from the home. The State may not establish the child’s
deprivation based on household circumstances that occur after a child’s removal. The parental deprivation which happened concurrent with or after the child’s removal cannot be used to satisfy deprivation requirements. [Download]

ACL 07-54: Federal Requirement To Contact Other States’ Child Abuse And Neglect Registries For Relative And Non-Relative Extended Family Member Home Approvals (12/27/07)

Title says it all. Any time after 1/1/08 that a foster care/probation placement application is made, all counties must contact the child abuse and neglect registry of each state in which a prospective foster or adoptive parent, relative caregiver, or nonrelative extended family member (including any other adult in the home) has resided in the past five years. In particular, it briefly reviews the process for approving a relative or nonrelative extended family member (NREFM) home.

ACL 07-51: (CalWORKs) Notifications To The Local Child Support Agency (LCSA) (12/14/07)

This ACL addresses policy related to referrals to the LCSA, applicant/recipient cooperation requirements, good cause notifications to the LCSA and other notifications related to the county’s case actions.  Reminders about how to handle the case when an applicant/recipient is being referred for a good cause/deferral of cooperation review, and how the LSCSA and counties are to determine "cooperation."

ACL 07-48: Clarifying Guidance Regarding Candidates For Foster Care (11/20/07)

Clarification on when a child is a “candidate” for foster care, for purposes of getting IV-E funds for pre-placement prevention services.  The definition of “candidate” is that the child be “at serious risk of removal”  as evidenced by the state agency either pursuing his/her removal from the home or making reasonable efforts to prevent such removal,” this was interpreted too broadly.  The clarification states that “a decision must have been made that the next step for the child was foster care.”  In California, this can be documented in one of 3 ways: 1) A defined case plan which clearly indicates that, absent effective preventive services, foster care is the planned arrangement for the child; 2) Evidence of court removal proceedings ; OR 3) An eligibility determination form completed by the County Welfare Department which establishes the child’s eligibility under Title IV-E.  Documentation needs to be done every 6 months.  [Download

ACL 07-27: Child Welfare Services Criminal Record Checks (10/30/07)

The letter implements AB 1774, and clarifies for whom and how a county child welfare agency or probation department obtains state and federal level criminal history information as part of the process of assessing a relative or nonrelative extended family member for placement. These primarily are technical changes.

The decision whether to seek to obtain the parent’s or legal guardian’s criminal history is made on a case-by-case basis, and the information may only be obtained if the parent or legal guardian has agreed to submit fingerprints for this purpose as part of the family reunification case plan. Only criminal record history that occurred subsequent to the removal of the child can be considered. In addition, once the Department of Justice (DOJ) has provided the criminal record history, a request for subsequent arrest notification cannot be made. In order to obtain a criminal record history, the county child welfare agency or probation department must submit Live Scan fingerprint transactions to the DOJ. [Download]