ACL 08-32: Food Stamp Waiver Of Face-To-Face Interview And Non-Assistance Food Stamp Household Recertification (7/14/08)

The letter transmits state regulations and provides implementation instructions on waiving the face-to-face interview for Quarterly Reporting (QR) households at county option, and for households with elderly or disabled household members. Based on a 2 year FNS waiver (also attached). &nbsp. No change in the info needed at recert. 

Counties 1) MUST do face-to-face at application (unless hardship); 2) MAY conduct a telephone interview at recertification process without documenting a hardship (but counties waiving in person interviews for QR households must do it county-wide); 3) A face-to-face interview MUST still be conducted at recertification if: requested by the household or AR; when the county determines it is necessary to verify conditions of eligibility; or if the household has not complied with Statewide Fingerprint Imaging System (SFIS) requirements.

For Public Assistance Food Stamp (PAFS) households and mixed households, a face-to-face interview may still be required by another program. Therefore, the FSP recertification interview will be conducted in conjunction with the other program’s interview.

For households in which elderly/disabled all members are elderly/disabled, counties may conduct a telephone interview in place of a face-to-face interview at application, as well as at recertification, without documenting hardship. [Download]

ACIN I-52-08: Prohibitions On Counties In Requesting Personally Identifying Information Of Victims Of Domestic Abuse From Service Providers In Awarding Grants (7/15/08)

SB 1491 limits the personally identifying information that counties may request from nongovernmental provides of domestic abuse services. It is unlawful for any entity to request or require that a victim service provider disclose personally identifying information regarding any of the persons to whom it is/has/is considering/has considered providing services; or request or require that a victim service provider use any computer software or system that requires the disclosure of personally identifying information (which the letter describes).

The law does allow counties to use an individual’s case number, his or her first name and year of birth, and/or the service provider’s client file number, but CDSS strongly encourages counties to reconsider the use of an individual’s first name in combination with any other information that can ultimately identify the individual. Counties should consider using the county’s case number and the provider’s internal case number for identification. 

The letter identifies a promising practice of establishing a centralized unit of specialized supportive services workers to handle only domestic abuse cases. [Download]

ACL 08-36: Camacho V. Allenby Lawsuit (SIP Support Services) (7/28/08)

Instructions to implement the Camacho lawsuit on support services for SIP participation prior to the signing of the WTW plan. Reimbursement is due for all cases with SIPs approved as of April 7, 2008. Reimbursement must occur when the expense meets all of the following conditions: 1) The expense was incurred after the beginning date of aid; 2) The expense was necessary for participation during the academic period or term (semester or quarter) in which the SIP is approved; 3) The expense is determined eligible under CalWORKs regulations; and 4) The expense was an unreimbursed out-of-pocket cost. Counties are only obligated to pay for supportive service costs that were necessary for participation in the academic period or term (semester or quarter) in which the SIP is approved. [Download]

ACIN I-47-08: CalWORKs Child Care And Supportive Services And On-Line Courses (7/29/08)

The Notice provides guidance to CWDs regarding the inclusion of on-line courses in a WTW plan and when it is appropriate to provide CalWORKs supportive services for individuals participating in approved on-line courses. This ACIN does not address study time (wait for that with bated breath). Bottom line: on-line courses are a form of eduation, and CWDs must allow on-line courses as an activity if they are consistent with the participant’s assessment and participation can be verified. However, if the assigned activity is available in more than one format, counties may adopt a policy of requiring one over another. CWDs have written standards on the approval of on-line courses, and must apply their policies equitably to all participants. CalWORKs participants assigned to on-line courses are eligible for supportive services including transportation, ancillary expenses, and child care. Child care services shall be provided based on the individual’s need for the services, taking into account scheduling and other factors, such as other WTW activities, transportation, disabilities, and other factors that may render it necessary to take the on-line course at a time other than during school hours. CWDs cannot deny child care on the basis that the course could be taken during night hours when the children are sleeping. Another letter will be issued on verifying participation and hours. [Download]