The latest rates for children who are served by both California Regional Centers and California Child Welfare and Probation Agencies. The letter throws in a few definitions for clarity. [Download]
The latest rates for children who are served by both California Regional Centers and California Child Welfare and Probation Agencies. The letter throws in a few definitions for clarity. [Download]
This letter clarifies the implementation of SB 39, pertaining to the disclosure of child fatality information, and includes a revised reporting form. This policy is not retroactive for cases prior to January 1, 2008. SB 39 requires that local agencies respond directly to public requests for information related to a child fatality that is the result of abuse or neglect. The Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA), requires that states disclose to the public findings and information about cases of child abuse and neglect that result in fatalities or near fatalities. The SOC 826 has been revised and renamed Child Fatality/Near Fatality County Statement of Findings and Information, to reflect the reporting requirements of SB 39 and to remain in compliance with CAPTA. The county must submit the SOC 826 for ALL cases of child fatalities if there is reasonable suspicion that it is as a result of abuse or neglect within five business days of learning of the incident, with follow up within 10 days.
The ACL also covers which county is responsible for the report. If the county determines that the fatality/near fatality was the result of abuse or neglect, it must respond to a public inquiry and provide information, as listed in the ACL. If the investigation does NOT conclude that the death/injury was from abuse/neglect, the county is to provide NO information. The letter also reviews the standards and process for objections to to the release of documentation, and agency comments regarding the information released. And what’s a bureaucracy without a discussion of documentation of files issues and annual reporting? [Download]
California requires all Adoption Facilitators to register with the CDSS. (Adoption facilitators put birth mothers in touch with prospective adoptive parents, and are to disclose that they are not adoption agencies.) This ACL discusses the standards for registration, which involves an application and Live Scan. The letter discusses the complaint process, and lists the “no no’s” for facilitators (can’t advertise or photograph children, have even momentary custody of the child to be adopted, or mislead parties that the facilitator is an adoption agency.) [Download]
HHS told CDSS it was out of compliance with the Improper Payments Information Act (IPIA) (read “overpayments”) of 2002 and that the state’s practice of repaying the federal share of overpayments only upon collection is not acceptable. (CDSS initially issued ACL 06-48 on this issue, and counties were directed to identify and track all federal foster care and adoption assistance overpayments beginning October 1, 2006, and ACIN I-60-07identifies best practice guidelines.) To ensure state and county compliance with federal reporting requirements for Title IV-E overpayments, several sections of the Welfare and Institutions Code were amended. This letter reviews those changes.
The letter clarifies collection against foster family homes, relative homes, non-related extended family members and legal guardians. The recovery of these overpayment funds must be done in a way that does not jeopardize the overall availability of placements for foster or adoptive children, as well as to act in the best interests of the foster or adoptive child. In addition to identifying the conditions under which a county should not collect an overpayment, and providing examples, the letter reviews the types of costs counties should consider when determining the cost effectiveness of collecting overpayments. Due process for providers will now be through the use of both informal and formal hearings rather than a review. [Download]
The Gomez v. Saenz lawsuit settlement provided individuals with the opportunity to challenge their listing on the Child Abuse Central Index (CACI), and created grievance hearing procedures for this purpose. This ACIN lists the new grievance hearing requirements, pending approval of the regulations on this issue. It covers advising individuals of their right to the hearing and the process, the nature of the request form, scheduling of the hearing, and how the hearing will be conducted. [Download]
AB 1331 requires counties to screen all foster youth for potential SSI/SSP eligibility when foster youth are at least 16.5 years of age and no more than 17.5 years of age. The statute also addresses the problem with current federal regulations, which causes the denial of SSI to youth getting foster care benefits over the SSI level of PRIOR to having a medical eligibility determination. Counties are to forego federal AFDC-FC benefits for the potentially SSI/SSP eligible youth for one month, during which time an SSI/SSP application is submitted. Social Security agreed to accept and process applications for foster youth during the month they are in receipt of State AFDC-FC. Counties thus must transfer a youth from federal AFDC-FC to State AFDC-FC for one month while the SSI/SSP application is submitted. After the one month transfer, the youth must be transferred back to federal AFDC-FC. The letter reminds counties to submit applications early enough to allow a determination to be made by SSA as to the youth’s eligibility PRIOR to the youth’s emancipation (estimating this takes six months!). Once the youth has been determined to be medically eligible for SSI/SSP, if the youth is in receipt of federal AFDC-FC benefits in excess to what they would receive in SSI/SSP, counties can request that the SSA put the youth’s SSI/SSP benefits in suspense for up to 12 months.
Though effective January 1, 2008, no additional funds to implement the bill are available in the current Fiscal Year. The ACL encourages counties to implement AB 1331 with existing allocations. [Download]