ACIN I-38-04 – CalWORKs Welfare-To-Work Inter-County Transfers (ICT) (6/4/04)

The long-awaited for, but not so pleasant guidelines from the state on developing and approving WTW plans and providing supportive services to CalWORKs recipients who move from one county to another. “CDSS encourages counties to make every effort to help the individual make a smooth and expeditious transition …” The “receiving” (new) County is, within the 30-day ITC period, to establish a CalWORKs WTW case and ensure participation. During this time, the county “can” do an assessment, and review the previous CalWORKs WTW plan, if one was completed, and determine that plan remains appropriate, given the labor market and available resources in the “new” county. If so, the county should refer the individual to that activity, “when feasible.” If a specific activity is appropriate, but not available, the county should refer the individual to a “comparable activity.” If the old plan is no longer appropriate, the county must determine the appropriate WTW activity and amend the plan. Continuation in the original welfare to work plan is specifically stated as being solely within the county’s discretion. The ACIN sets out some considerations, though to guide this discretion, including items not found in the statute or regs, such as whether “the training location is within the norm of how far other people in the same county customarily travel for training or for work,” whether the individual complied with the requirements of his or her current program “in a manner that leads the county to believe that he or she will successfully complete the program,” and whether the individual will be able to complete the current activity within a reasonable period of time. The county should also determine the appropriate support services during the ITC period. [Download]

ACIN I-29-04 – Quarterly Reporting Q & As (May 20, 2004)

More fun from the world of quarterly reporting. With a mid-quarter report, when is a person approved/denied (mid-quarter or when reported on the QR-7)? When the county approves or denies! How to determine quarter cycle for ITC’s, supplements vs. offsetting Overpayments, dealing with inconsistencies between no-change mid-quarter reports and the QR-7, multiple changes within a quarter, etc. Notable for being the first to deal with Tribal TANF issues (some opted not to do). [Download]

ACL 04-19 – Policy Changes To The Quarterly Reporting System (June 1, 2004)

Clarifies the limited circumstances under which counties can use the “conversion factor” (2.37 or 4.33) for less than monthly income payments. (It’s limited to when income is certain, will repeat in same payment manner.) This changes aspects of the “fluctuating income” info in the original QR ACL. [Download]

ACL 04-14 – Continuation of Medi-Cal Benefits in CalWORKs Intercounty Transfer Cases (April 14, 2004)

Well, we all know Medi-Cal is not supposed to terminate when CalWORKs does, but what the heck do you do when the cessation of cash aid is at the same time as an Intercounty Transfer (ITC)? This ACL instructs to counties what to do. Even has a companion form, attached to the ACL, to request Medi-Cal case documentation from the “sending” county, and a list of ITC coordinators. [Download]

ACIN I-10-04 – Quarterly Reporting Q’s and A’s(February 25, 2004)

One more set of Q’s and A’s. This one’s really for the QR wonks. Helpful and reviewing “County-Initiated Actions” (a mid-quarter change) and multiple-change situations (when more than one factor affecting eligibility occurs during the quarter). For the full set, go to the Quarterly Reporting Q and A website. [Download]