Author: Brian Lawlor

ACL 04-30 – Regulations to Implement Quarterly Reporting (July 26, 2004)

Posted on by

Effective July 1 (okay, so they weren’t issued until three weeks later), the QR regs are officially in place, with links in the ACL to the actual regs. What’s new since the ACL? A QR 7 report of a decrease of income shall be treated as a mid-quarter report (i.e. your bennies can go up), and any starting or increase in other income (like getting UI when you lose your job) doesn’t count till the next quarter; when seeing if adding a person to an AU/HH mid-quarter results in an increase in benefits, the county must use the AU/HH’s existing anticipated income, not recalculate it; when a change in exempt/non-exempt MAP status would occur under QR, and more! (Yes, Virginia, you DO need to read these.)

And while we’re at it: these regulations are open for public comment, due August 25th. [Download]

ACIN I-49-04 – CalWORKs Family Reunification (FR) Program (July 14, 2004)

Posted on by

Although the Family Reunification (FR) regulations were effective in April, the notice is just going out now, the state having given up on writing Q & A’s to clarify the new policy for now. Counties must provide welfare-to-work (“WTW”) activities and supportive services to the parents of children in out-of-home care, via Child Welfare Services, if necessary for family reunification (“FR”). Of note:

• 18- or 24-month time limit does not apply to FR services.

• Sanctioned adults can still get FR WTW services.

• A CalWORKs assessment and WTW plan are required for any WTW activities and services separate and beyond those specified in the FR plan.

• CalWORKs WTW sanction provisions don’t apply to reunification parents if they are soley in an FR (vs. a WTW) plan.

• Time during which a sanctioned individual is a reunification parent counts toward meeting the CalWORKs minimum sanction period. [Download]

HUD Litigation Handbook Directive 1530.1, REV-5 – May 18, 2004

Posted on by

This revised handbook describes in detail the responsibilities of the HUD Office of General Counsel for handling and monitoring litigation (not administrative proceedings) in which HUD or a HUD official is a party and also when a Department-funded entity such as a Public Housing Authority is a party. It may serve as a useful tool in understanding the HUD OGC hierarchy and why HUD OGC responds as it does when you sue the agency. [Download]